Environmental Damage Criteria in Indonesia: The Multi-Media Assessment Framework Under PP 22/2021

1.0 Regulatory Framework for Environmental Damage Determination

Government Regulation PP 22/2021 establishes comprehensive criteria for determining when environmental damage has occurred across Indonesia's natural systems. Chapter VI (BAB VI) addresses Environmental Damage Control (Pengendalian Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup), while Annex VII (LAMPIRAN VII) provides specific threshold parameters for soil, water, air, ecosystem, and biodiversity damage assessment.

The damage criteria framework serves multiple regulatory purposes: triggering enforcement actions against polluters, determining restoration requirements, calculating environmental compensation, and guiding remediation priorities. When measured parameters exceed established thresholds, the environment is classified as "damaged" (rusak), triggering legal obligations under Indonesia's environmental protection framework.

This system integrates with the broader environmental management structure established in PP 22/2021. Environmental Approval holders must prevent activities from causing damage exceeding these thresholds. AMDAL and UKL-UPL assessments must address potential damage impacts. Violations exposing facilities to administrative sanctions and restoration fund activation.

1.1 Nine Damage Categories

Pasal 272 ayat (2) establishes:

Kriteria baku Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (1) meliputi kriteria baku kerusakan: a. Terumbu Karang; b. Mangrove; c. Padang Lamun; d. tanah untuk produksi biomassa; e. gambut; f. karst; g. lingkungan yang berkaitan dengan kebakaran hutan dan/atau lahan; h. lahan akibat Usaha dan/atau Kegiatan pertambangan.

1.2 Implementation Hierarchy

Pasal 272 ayat (6) provides:

Dalam hal kriteria baku Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (5) belum ditetapkan, penentuan kriteria baku Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup dilakukan berdasarkan hasil kajian atau pendapat ahli.

Where ministerial regulations have not yet established specific criteria, environmental damage determination proceeds based on expert studies or professional opinions.

---

2.0 Soil Damage Criteria

Annex VII establishes threshold parameters across physical, chemical, and biological dimensions for determining soil damage.

2.1 Physical Parameters

2.2 Chemical Parameters

2.3 Biological Parameters

Heavy metal contamination criteria reflect internationally-recognized thresholds for agricultural and residential land use. Biological parameters emphasize soil ecosystem function, recognizing that physical and chemical damage ultimately manifests through biological degradation.

---

3.0 Water Damage Criteria

Water damage criteria differentiate between surface water and groundwater, with parameters across physical, chemical, and biological dimensions. These criteria complement the freshwater quality standards established elsewhere in PP 22/2021.

3.1 Surface Water Physical Parameters

3.2 Surface Water Chemical Parameters

3.3 Surface Water Biological Parameters

3.4 Groundwater Parameters

Groundwater damage criteria focus on aquifer sustainability and quality degradation that affects both drinking water supplies and baseflow to surface water systems.

---

4.0 Air Damage Criteria

Air damage thresholds define conditions indicating environmental harm from atmospheric pollution. These criteria relate to but differ from the ambient air quality standards used for air quality management planning.

4.1 Particulate Matter Parameters

4.2 Gaseous Pollutant Parameters

4.3 Environmental Impact Indicators

Air damage criteria use shorter averaging periods than ambient standards, reflecting acute harm thresholds rather than long-term management targets.

---

5.0 Ecosystem and Biodiversity Damage Criteria

Beyond individual environmental media, the framework addresses ecosystem-level and biodiversity damage that transcends single-parameter measurements.

5.1 Ecosystem Structure Damage

5.2 Ecosystem Function Damage

5.3 Species Composition Damage

5.4 Biodiversity Damage - Genetic Level

5.5 Biodiversity Damage - Species and Ecosystem Level

These ecological criteria recognize that environmental damage extends beyond chemical contamination to encompass structural, functional, and compositional changes affecting ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation.

---

6.0 Assessment Methodology and Classification

Annex VII establishes standardized assessment methodologies ensuring consistent damage determination across Indonesia.

6.1 Damage Classification Scale

6.2 Assessment Requirements

6.3 Implementation and Response

---

7.0 Traditional Land Clearing Exception

The regulation provides a specific exception for traditional burning practices reflecting Indonesia's recognition of kearifan lokal (local wisdom).

7.1 Exception Conditions

Pasal 273 ayat (1-2) establishes:

Ketentuan mengenai kriteria baku Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 272 ayat (2) huruf g, dikecualikan terhadap kegiatan pembukaan lahan dengan cara pembakaran yang dilakukan masyarakat di lahan miliknya sendiri. Pelaksanaan pembukaan lahan dengan cara pembakaran dilakukan berdasarkan kearifan lokal.

7.2 Government Support Obligations

This exception balances environmental protection with traditional agricultural practices, subject to strict conditions preventing uncontrolled fires.

---

Conclusion

Indonesia's environmental damage criteria under PP 22/2021 provide a comprehensive multi-media framework for determining when environmental harm has occurred. The system covers nine damage categories across soil, water, air, ecosystem, and biodiversity parameters, with specific thresholds triggering damage classification and response requirements.

The four-level damage classification (minor through critical) connects assessment findings to proportionate response obligations. Standardized assessment methodologies ensure consistent application across jurisdictions, while the expert opinion pathway addresses situations where specific criteria have not yet been established through ministerial regulations.

For business operators, understanding these damage criteria is essential for compliance management. Activities generating contamination or ecosystem impacts must be controlled to prevent threshold exceedances. Where damage occurs, operators face restoration obligations under the environmental restoration fund mechanism and potential administrative sanctions including permit suspension or revocation.

The traditional burning exception demonstrates regulatory recognition of community practices while maintaining environmental protection through strict conditions. This balanced approach reflects Indonesia's broader environmental management philosophy of integrating protection objectives with social and economic realities.

---

Official Sources

• PP 22/2021 Full Text - JDIH BPK
• UU 32/2009 Environmental Protection Law - JDIH BPK

---

Disclaimer

This article was drafted with AI-assisted research tools and reviewed by the CRPG editorial team. For legal advice, please consult a qualified professional. The content is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or authoritative interpretation of regulations.

We accept no liability whatsoever for any decisions made based on this article. Readers are strongly advised to:

• Consult the official regulation text from government sources
• Seek professional legal counsel for specific matters
• Verify all information independently

This AI-assisted application is designed to improve access to regulatory information.

Law Database

Access PP 22/2021 in the CRPG Law Database: PP 22/2021